Woman and Sex, means biological sex.

Status
Not open for further replies.
BTW, is Tom (Himmy) your alter ego?
You seem to write in the same style, refer to same links and defend each other...
Do you do this sort of thing out of self-defence?

Does too much of the fiction you have constructed to replace reality start to crumble if it encounters more than one person who points out the same flaws in it?
 
I know in South America, there is a tribe where the person can look like a woman until puberty, but are in fact men, so with that in mind, one can't really be sure of a child's sex. But the problem is, I would not feel happy for a person dressed like a woman going into the men's, even if they are male.
That could be an unintended consequence of the SC ruling.
It'll lead to more confusion. Children especially will be totally confused.
Imagine walking into a male single sex space for it to be crowded with people dressed as women.

Female toilets have a cubical, so it does not really matter. It is the male toilets where the problem lies, as we have urinals. But it means we will need men's, women's, and others toilets. And in the main we do, they are called disabled toilets, which means the real disabled are going to have a problem.
Disabled people have received such special treatment for a long time.
Now transgenders will be entitled to such special treatment.
In the Radio 4 prog yesterday there was a discussion of transgenders being accommodated in private rooms in hospitals.
I thought, 'that'll never work. Everyone going into a hospital will be transgender'.

At the end of the day, how will it be policed?
If the public are entitled to challenge others using single sex spaces, there's going to be a few arguments and embarrassed people.

The law displaying its equinine qualities.
 
People take different positions and are more persuaded by one argument rather than another. That's just life.

It isn't a case of "refusing to consider".
You have absolutely no expertise in the matter, but, wow, what a coincidence, you choose to believe the arguments which agree with your prejudiced bigotry, and refuse to consider the ones which don't.

Don't ever try sky-diving with a parachute which works as well as your mind - you'll die.
 
You have absolutely no expertise in the matter, but, wow, what a coincidence, you choose to believe the arguments which agree with your prejudiced bigotry, and refuse to consider the ones which don't.

Don't ever try sky-diving with a parachute which works as well as your mind - you'll die.
You are welcome to your opinion. Most people, if not all, tend to believe the arguments they agree with.
 
Do you do this sort of thing out of self-defence?

Does too much of the fiction you have constructed to replace reality start to crumble if it encounters more than one person who points out the same flaws in it?
I am not part of this debate in any way rather than take the Mickey out of the likes of yous (allow me the incorrect plural).
I know exactly what a woman is, I don't need anyone telling me.
 
I am not part of this debate in any way rather than take the Mickey out of the likes of yous (allow me the incorrect plural).
I know exactly what a woman is, I don't need anyone telling me.
So you are content seeing people, who appear to be men, going into single sex female spaces?

The plural of you is not yous. It's you.
 
You are welcome to your opinion. Most people, if not all, tend to believe the arguments they agree with.
Some people, when they encounter arguments/evidence/facts which run counter to what they previously believed consider them, and may change their position as a result.

The word for those people is intelligent.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top