Boss of British Chambers of Commerce Sacked For Supporting Brexit

Sponsored Links
That's right. That is because the BCC said their members were divided on the subject and so they would not make any comments either way. And then this guy did.
The brexit lot's conspiracy theories are just making them look desperate.
 
As DG of such a prodigious club you would expect him to know the rules and standards pertaining to his position.
If he speaks against the official stated position of that club, AND in such opposition to 60% of the members, I would have expected him to have resigned prior to making such a contradictory and confrontational speech.
Emma Jones, founder of rival business trade group Enterprise Nation, said: ‘As head of British Chambers, it was John’s responsibility to speak on behalf of members.
‘He clearly expressed a personal opinion – and a position with which many of his members were not in agreement.
His suspension is a result of that. When speaking on member platforms, the role should be to speak on behalf of members and to represent their view.’
From your linked article.

I won't bother going in to too many details of his comments, except to point out a few notable points, from the same article:
Longworth, 57, isn’t speaking off the cuff. He has spent the last three years researching the effect on Britain if it were to leave Europe.
‘I have lived and breathed this issue,’ he says. ‘I’ve spent a lot of time looking at economic reports, consulting with countries that we trade with within and outside Europe, with economists, think tanks, the Bank of England.
So he knows what he's talking about?
'We won’t have access to decision-making, but we’ll have to pay into a budget. We’ll have to apply free movement of people, but we’ll have no say.
Well clearly he either doesn't know what he's talking about or he's confused or he's intentionally causing confusion.
If we're IN we cannot be forced to accept the Schengen Agreement. If we're OUT, well that depends on the Trade Agreement.
Of course, if we leave then our future will be determined by whether we get a good negotiated deal with the EU after leaving.
Hmm, maybe he does know what he's talking about.
We are Germany’s biggest export market. They’re hardly likely to want to stop selling us stuff.’
Or maybe he doesn't know what he's talking about. We've explored this and found that of course the EU (not just Germany) will continue to export to UK. It will depend on our import tariffs on how that works out.
‘There will be short-term disruption, there’s no use ducking that issue.
‘But are we prepared to bear that short-term disruption for the bright future? That’s the real question.’
‘The worst-case scenario if we left is that the EU applied all of the tariffs they now apply to other foreign countries.
'The current drop in the value of our currency has already compensated us for most of those tariffs overnight.
‘So our goods now are going to be as cheap as they would have been before the application of the tariff.
So he's accepted that the GBP will lose value, and with the current EU subsidy, that will magically pay for the EU import tariffs.:rolleyes:
He forgets to mention the soaring cost of imported goods and services to UK, the soaring cost of foreign travel, holidays, etc. So we'd be considerably worse off, unless we're content with only UK made goods, foodstuffs and Blackpool holidays. :rolleyes:

Well, we are an island nation after all. :rolleyes:
 
He forgets to mention the soaring cost of imported goods and services to UK, the soaring cost of foreign travel, holidays, etc.

Shouldn't those words have been prefaced with the word 'possible'?!
 
Sponsored Links
Employee of British Chambers of Commerce Suspended For Contravening his Organisation's Official Agreed Policy

The organisation has officially adopted a neutral position, and polls of its members show 60 per cent in favour of staying in, with 30 per cent in favour of leaving.

Fixed that for you.
 
He forgets to mention the soaring cost of imported goods and services to UK, the soaring cost of foreign travel, holidays, etc.

Shouldn't those words have been prefaced with the word 'possible'?!
What? Like: Possibly he forgets to mention.....?

Just kidding.

But NO! is the answer. John Longworth, although a Brexit campaigner recognises that devaluation of the pound would be inevitable, in the event of Brexit.
He says:
'The current drop in the value of our currency has already compensated us for most of those tariffs overnight.

He does not mention that devaluation of the pound increases the cost of foreign goods and services. There is no uncertainty.
It could also increase the cost of UK manufactured goods and services, because any use of imported goods/services, would also be more expensive, e.g. imported energy, etc.

Which reminds me of another increase in costs to UK citizens in the event of Brexit, higher cost of imported energy and fuel, even if we do only buy British and holiday in Blackpool. But a holiday which would be more expensive in travel, couldn't afford the wine, brandy, etc. :rolleyes:

In fact, some economists argue that devaluation does little:
If devaluation solved the problems of the British Economy, the UK would have one of the strongest trade balances in the global economy ....
http://www.thesaturdayeconomist.com/the-great-devaluation-myth--uk-and-sterling.html
 
But the devaluation of the pound against which currencies?

USD - probable
Euro - possible but, in the event that a UK exit happens, is that the start of a significant unravelling of the EU and a blow to the already fragile Euro?
 
But a holiday which would be more expensive in travel, couldn't afford the wine, brandy, etc. :rolleyes:

Ahh is that all that's worrying you Himmy? No need to worry, there's some excellent wines produced right here in the UK. (and due to climate change, we might be able to grow more grapes and beat the French at producing quality wines,,, and don't forget, if we can make wine, we can distill brandy ) :LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL:
 
As usual, jock, you don't have a clue what you're talking about.
UK consumes more than a billion litres of wine per annum. UK produces just over 3 million litres. Where do you think the rest comes from?:rolleyes:
You think it grows on trees? :giggle:

You should stick to what you know, like special strength tinnies. It no doubt helps with your bigoted opinions.

You're right UK does make brandy:
IN PRESENTATION BOX 50CL. (42%) - £48.10
20year.jpg


One barrel of Somerset Twenty Year Old will be bottled each year untill 2015
Hardly enough for your nightly guzzle though is it? :LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL:
 
He is actually the DG of the British Chambers of Commerce (edited)

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ons-hits-No-10-s-biblical-scare-language.html
What a surprise! The DM gets it wrong again:
The director general of the British Chambers of Commerce, John Longworth, has resigned ......
Announcing Mr Longworth's departure, the BCC said he had breached the group's official position of neutrality on the referendum.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-35741715
 
As the British Chamber of Commerce represents 70,000+ small businesses which employ millions of staff. Why can't they offer advice to those who need to know? Taking a neutral stance is a cop out and offers no help to those who are seeking advice as to whether their businesses will succeed in or out of the EU.

At least John Longworth has the backbone to speak out. The silence from the BCC is deafening.
 
As the British Chamber of Commerce represents 70,000+ small businesses which employ millions of staff. ..
60% of its members will vote to REMAIN, whereas only 30% will vote OUT. So BCC decided to take a neutral stance, except John Longworth couldn't. He had to spout his opinion despite representing the organisation that had declared a neutral stance.
 
As the British Chamber of Commerce represents 70,000+ small businesses which employ millions of staff. ..
60% of its members will vote to REMAIN, whereas only 30% will vote OUT. So BCC decided to take a neutral stance, except John Longworth couldn't. He had to spout his opinion despite representing the organisation that had declared a neutral stance.

So the BCC can just ignore the 10% 'don't knows' representing 100,000s of employees! If they wish to take a neutral stance, I'm sure they have someone of intelligence within their ranks who can give a balanced and informed view.
 
I have a feeling that Doug would have moaned even more if the organisation, instead of deciding to stay neutral, had campaigned for an "in" to reflect the 2 to 1 views of its members.

I doubt Doug would have admired "backbone" of BCC officers who spoke in favour of remaining.
 
Additionally, the remaining 10% are not "Don't know". They're undecided as yet.
I think they've been asking for more clarification from the OUT campaigners about possible trade agreement predictions. :whistle:

Moreover, those 10% do not represent their employees, as such, they represent themselves and their business, although obviously the result could immensely effect those employees.
The Unions represent the employees and they are overwhelmingly for REMAIN!
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top