Calm down captain nemesis,
You're talking to me. not Captain Nemesis, although I'm flattered that you confuse the two of us. He's obviously extremely intelligent and highly articulate.
Unfortunately you are easily confused. You asked who first mentioned Brexit when it was abundantly clear that Mottie first implied a connection between Brexit and European tourism.
I was making a statement saying that brexit hasn't affected tourism, noseall insinuated that it had. Nothing strawman about that.
Noseall did not make any statement claiming that Brexit had affected tourism. In fact Mottie was the first to imply that it had a relevance.
So you're inventing excuses to explain your strawman argument.
I wasn't arguing either for or against brexit, not on motties particular post.
No-one suggested you had. Is this yet another strawman argument?
In fact I've agreed that it is not the EU stating such things, it is only 2 individuals have made statements in the press. One is a government official, one the mayor of a town that doesn't have a great reputation anyway.
Not quite correct.
I notice that you edited your comment of last night after Captain Nemesis highlighted the obvious flaw in Mottie's comment.
But instead of correcting Mottie, or agreeing with Captain Nemesis that his critique was justified, you kind of supported Mottie's comment by presenting a few articles, although i have no idea what your comment stated prior to your editing.
On this occasion I am not in agreement with Mottie.
But only now you state that.
However the difference between the likes of me and Mottie and yourself and others on here like you is that we dont mind opinions differing to each other. We don't get all twisted up in Knott's about it, we are respectful to others.
The difference is that you are content to not voice a disagreement with an opinion that is so obviously wrong, and you even offer some supporting evidence, rather than being truthful.
You then try to cover your acts and omissions with strawman arguments.