Katie Hopkins

[motorbiking]

Is defending yourself harming your case? Is retracting an offer harming your case when the lawyers take over and express things differently with the benefit of legal expertise? Everything Munro did suggests (to me) a mature attempt to knock the whole thing on the head without involving the lawyers.

Her retaliatory tweets harmed her case, she knew this and deleted them. It’s discussed in point 84.

 

[motorbiking]

I do not understand why it was accepted it was mistaken identity

It makes no sense that Katie Hopkins was tweeting about @pennyred and then made a post referencing @MsJackMonroe.

And her posts don’t make a direct accusation of defacing a statue.


And why was the mistaken identity even part of the story….Jack Monroe only threatened court action if she didn’t retract and apologise, the mistaken identity is not relevant

None of it makes sense.

At least you accept the facts now. Apology to Pete? Perhaps

 

[blup]

Her retaliatory tweets harmed her case, she knew this and deleted them. It’s discussed in point 84.

The judge didn’t say the deletion harmed her case. paras 83 and 84 are broader observations. He doesn’t even attribute responsibility for the deletion to her.

 

[motorbiking]

The judge didn’t say the deletion harmed her case. paras 83 and 84 are broader observations. He doesn’t even attribute responsibility for the deletion to her.

He does attribute the responsibility to keep records for disclosure to her lawyers.

You should also read 63. Where the judge remarks on the claimants reply.

 

[Notch7]

At least you accept the facts now. Apology to Pete? Perhaps

the facts are that the mistaken identity had ZERO to do,with the court case.

Petal01 tried posting the “mistaken identity” element as a deflection.

No apology required.

 

[Notch7]

The right wing contingent are desperate to keep talking about the “mistaken identity” as a deflection to the fact Katie Hopkins is a nasty POS who spreads inflammatory hate language about migrants and anybody left wing like Jack Monroe.

 

[motorbiking]

the facts are that the mistaken identity had ZERO to do,with the court case.

Petal01 tried posting the “mistaken identity” element as a deflection.

No apology required.

No he didn’t. He summarised what he thought the case was about. He was 100% accurate. You and Nosenout went in on the attack and both look stupid. Again.

The right wing contingent are desperate to keep talking about the “mistaken identity” as a deflection to the fact Katie Hopkins is a nasty POS who spreads inflammatory hate language about migrants and anybody left wing like Jack Monroe.

Nobody has defended her.

 

[blup]

He does attribute the responsibility to keep records for disclosure to her lawyers.

That was a general observation too

You should also read 63. Where the judge remarks on the claimants reply.

Unhelpful is not the same as harming her case. He found here was serious harm. He was never going to find there was grave damage, because the the case wasn't at the top of the scale like accusing someone of geno cide.

 

[noseall]

the facts are that the mistaken identity had ZERO to do,with the court case.

Petal01 tried posting the “mistaken identity” element as a deflection.

No apology required.

Correct.

 

[motorbiking]

That was a general observation too

Unhelpful is not the same as harming her case. He found here was serious harm. He was never going to find there was grave damage, because the the case wasn't at the top of the scale like accusing someone of geno cide.

something that is unhelpful to your claim, means what it says. You will hardly ever find a judge goes further. Occasionally in family law you will see some amusing comments in financial settlements.

 

[algas]

Wish we had Katie Hopkins running the country instead of the headless chickens we have now.

 

[motorbiking]

She is definitely mad as a box of frogs, if very occasionally amusing.

 

[blup]

Wish we had Katie Hopkins running the country instead of the headless chickens we have now.

She is a headless chicken

 

[blup]

Leaving the Apprentice when she realised she wasn't going to win isn't the kind of resilience we need from someone running the country

 

[noseall]

She is a headless chicken

algas is a self confessed RWR racist. You will get little sense there.