Katie Hopkins

[noseall]

Your references are not proof that Hopkins first tweet was mistaken identity.

For example: “When it was pointed out by you to Ms Monroe that you had made a mistake”


All that proves is that Hopkins made the excuse that is was mistaken identity
here is another example: It “would have been understood [by] the ordinary reader as no more than a petulant acknowledgment by [her] that she had mistakenly identified [Ms Monroe] instead of Ms Penny”.[5]

All that proves is that Hopkins 2nd tweet using mistaken identity as an excuse…..achieved its aim as that’s what the ordinary reader may have thought.



I repeat: there is NO evidence that it was mistaken identity, there is only Hopkins claim that’s what her tweet meant.

Hopkins knew exactly who she was dealing with by the time she decided she wanted to take the fight to court. Mistaken identity my arse.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Again at mbk, very simply.

If KH had apologised would she have been taken to court ?

 

[motorbiking]

Again at mbk, very simply.

If KH had apologised would she have been taken to court ?

Apologised and corrected/retracted you mean?

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Apologised and corrected/retracted you mean?

It was, and is, a very simple question, it doesn't need explaining any further.

There is no swerving needed

 

[motorbiking]

An apology no - it would not have been good enough. Anything less than an apology, retraction and donation would have been unacceptable, particularly after her stupid escalation calling her "social anthrax". Monroe is no idiot, she is media savvy, she knew what it was worth. At that point it was not worth £5k. But the longer it went on, the more value it had.

 

[noseall]

Again at mbk, very simply.

If KH had apologised would she have been taken to court ?

No.

Monroe only took action when Hopkins decided that was the path she wished to go down. She had ample chance. Monroe was reluctant from the outset. Mistaken identity my arse.

 

[motorbiking]

No.

Monroe only took action when Hopkins decided that was the path she wished to go down. She had ample chance. Monroe was reluctant from the outset. Mistaken identity my arse.

At 7.33pm Ms Monroe tweeted in these terms: “I have NEVER ‘scrawled on a memorial’. Brother in the RAF. Dad was a Para in the Falklands. You’re a piece of s**.” (With a screenshot to the First Tweet)
Ms Monroe tweeted again at 7.36pm: “I’m asking you nicely to please delete this lie Katie, and if I have to ask again it will be through my lawyer.” (With a link to the First Tweet)
At 8.14pm Ms Monroe tweeted again, this time using Ms Hopkins’ Twitter handle: “Dear @KTHopkins, public apology +£5k to migrant rescue & I won’t sue. It’ll be cheaper for you and v. satisfying for me.”

less than 45 minutes

It was her {KH} cretinous antagonisation that sealed her fate.

 

[noseall]

At 7.33pm Ms Monroe tweeted in these terms: “I have NEVER ‘scrawled on a memorial’. Brother in the RAF. Dad was a Para in the Falklands. You’re a piece of s**.” (With a screenshot to the First Tweet)
Ms Monroe tweeted again at 7.36pm: “I’m asking you nicely to please delete this lie Katie, and if I have to ask again it will be through my lawyer.” (With a link to the First Tweet)
At 8.14pm Ms Monroe tweeted again, this time using Ms Hopkins’ Twitter handle: “Dear @KTHopkins, public apology +£5k to migrant rescue & I won’t sue. It’ll be cheaper for you and v. satisfying for me.”

It shows an exchange between the two parties. And?

It doesn't change the fact that Hopkins had ample time and chance to keep it out of court. She chose not to. Monroe proceeded. Mistaken identity my arse.

Meanwhile this other bullshít still isnt true...

The demand for an apology was not sincere.

Lies.

Monroe’s offer was not sincere and rapidly retracted

More lies

 

[Lirefighter]

At 7.33pm Ms Monroe tweeted in these terms: “I have NEVER ‘scrawled on a memorial’. Brother in the RAF. Dad was a Para in the Falklands. You’re a piece of s**.” (With a screenshot to the First Tweet)
Ms Monroe tweeted again at 7.36pm: “I’m asking you nicely to please delete this lie Katie, and if I have to ask again it will be through my lawyer.” (With a link to the First Tweet)
At 8.14pm Ms Monroe tweeted again, this time using Ms Hopkins’ Twitter handle: “Dear @KTHopkins, public apology +£5k to migrant rescue & I won’t sue. It’ll be cheaper for you and v. satisfying for me.”

less than 45 minutes

It was her {KH} cretinous antagonisation that sealed her fate.

In Hopkins situation there'd be no way I would bow down to that demand either.
Did this Monroe woman donate at least £5grand of he winnings to the charity she mentioned?

 

[mattylad]

Crikey, your still droning on about that case?
Katie has moved on, why don't you?

Try stop bitching to each other about stuff that happened and do something else instead, perhaps try getting on together instead of constantly arguing.

 

[noseall]

In Hopkins situation there'd be no way I would bow down to that demand either.

Why would you, when you are clearly in the wrong, solicitors are screaming at you to settle and you can become broke and lose your house? The RWR don't wear that label with pride for nothing.

Did this Monroe woman donate at least £5grand of he winnings to the charity she mentioned?

I think she probably took a load of girls to Benidorm and celebrated Hopkins' utter stupidity.

 

[motorbiking]

Lies.

More lies

still grizzling.

 

[noseall]

still grizzling.

Still lying.

 

[noseall]

Katie has moved on,

Yep, the disgusting c**t has moved on to mocking the disabled, Trump style, a new low even for her. It's how this thread started.
Does it make you feel uncomfortable?

 

[Notch7]

Anything less than an apology, retraction and donation would have been unacceptable

Monroes first tweet response didn’t ask for money, it said:

“I have NEVER ‘scrawled on a memorial’. Brother in the RAF. Dad was a Para in the Falklands. You’re a piece of ****.”

Had Hopkins apologised at that point and retracted, nothing further would’ve happened, there was no need for a donation to charity