Well. it sort of does.just because you disagree with some thing does not make u unprincipled & irresponsible ?
Do you think that is their main concern?Invoke your scenario of mass resignations & there would be total chaos.
Invoke your scenario of mass resignations & there would be total chaos.
Evil witch
At least Cameron did the decent thing.
I wonder where some people get their information from:It's every damned politicians missmanagment of the economy that has necessitated the budget cuts, but it's also the local councils that pay towards the police budgets, and I don't see any of them being asked to resign.
And it was the police forces themselves that made the actual cuts, whilst adding funds in to their reserves.
researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7279/CBP-7279.pdfIn England and Wales the main source of income for the 43 geographic police forces is central government grant made available through the annual Home Office Police Grant Report.
2. Funding reductions According to figures from the National Audit Office (NAO), from 2010/11 to 2015/16 central government grant to police and crime commissioners and their equivalents in London including specific grants and council tax freeze grants has reduced £2.2 billion in real terms. This represents a 22% real terms reduction
Well. it sort of does.
She's not a soldier just carrying out orders.
Either she agreed and thought there were just too many police before - or
she disagreed and made the country less safe than it need be.
If the former - fair enough. Do you think that is the case?
If the latter - not the prime objective of the Home Secretary.
Of course, she is now on another mission to promote that which twelve months ago she thought NOT to be the best for the country.
Along with all but ten (I think) of her party colleagues.
At least Cameron did the decent thing.
Do you think that is their main concern?
That must be the reason for the whip system.
I'd probably call that "arranged marriages."What would you call the 15 & 16 year old school kiddies who left London to become jihadi brides? I would call them vulnerable because they are so young.
You probably would Judith. Do you think that is what happened on this occasion, i.e. the parents of the bride and groom arranged the marriage?I'd probably call that "arranged marriages."
Hello hello the ignored member is back in the UK (may be ?)
My imaginary spouse did not go, but thanks for your concern about him, as always.hope the missis got back with the baggage safely ?
I will take your word for it. Although you do not have a passport. Why will they not give you a passport? Just asking.probably hot in Saudi this time of year ? plenty of sun cream ? hat is also the order of the day in those hot climates,
I have a few and they fit well, thanks. They do not get in my way for spelling, or for punctuating my comments, but I see you have multiple problems.that assume s u can find one big enough ? to fit yer ead
A typical "When I do not have something to say, I still have to say something" from arse end.well u may have a point (?)
but I do not agree with it ,but at this moment in time I cannot think of a useful response so I am thinking about it
What about the attackers themselves?blood on her hands . no I do not think so . perhaps the person who allowed the terroristsparentsinto the UK has blood on there hands
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-40183147One of the London Bridge attackers was able to enter the UK, despite being placed on an EU-wide watch list.
You probably would Judith. Do you think that is what happened on this occasion, i.e. the parents of the bride and groom arranged the marriage?
(this is the bit where Judith bullshi ts her way through the thread and then disappears when she's run out of bullsh it or is asked questions that make her squirm and she cant answer).