You think Whitty and Vallance have saved 450,000 lives because they thought of a number.
What does that make you?
Pfizer vaccine report
- Thread starter Trazor
- Start date
- Status
What does that make you?
Sponsored Links
You did notice how well the first lockdown worked, didn't you.
Care to tell us all how many deaths there would have been if the Virus had been left to rip through the population.
Capable of counting.
Without doubt, more. But 450,000 more?
Sponsored Links
Totally agree, but would you shoulder that sort of responsibility, and possibly get it wrong.
Mrs Dangee just said (shortly before stomping upstairs with the hump coz I’m still doing paperwork)whilst we watched a news story of a bloke who previously looked a bit like a bodybuilder turned into a fragile shadow of his former self with Covid “the government have missed a trick...... loads of people still don’t realise/believe the severity of the virus, why don’t they play a recording everyday of different families it has affected”? It’s true. If the younger folk saw the possible results of Covid, they might act differently.
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2016
- Messages
- 13,424
- Reaction score
- 540
- Country
The point isn't only 3-400 die daily and then compare that to the number of people die due to flu.
There are currently 16,390 people in Hospital -taking up a bed. We have only 100k General Admin beds - (10k lost in the last decade - thanks Tories but that's another discussion)
Of which 1400 are on ventilators.
The issue is that the virus is shifting resources away from the daily NHS work.
It would be great if the NHS had greater capacity to deal with this but sadly it does not - will it change in the future? Who knows - we have a decade more of Tory rule.
This is all before we deal with the cost of Long Covid symptoms.
There are currently 16,390 people in Hospital -taking up a bed. We have only 100k General Admin beds - (10k lost in the last decade - thanks Tories but that's another discussion)
Of which 1400 are on ventilators.
The issue is that the virus is shifting resources away from the daily NHS work.
It would be great if the NHS had greater capacity to deal with this but sadly it does not - will it change in the future? Who knows - we have a decade more of Tory rule.
This is all before we deal with the cost of Long Covid symptoms.
Did it do well? Someone else said 'spectacularly effective'; was it?
The first lockdown was introduced to "flatten the curve" to save The Health Service to the detriment of other illnesses.
Ah, the "let rip" argument. No more in the long run.
Tell us why you think the UK would have been ten times worse without the spring lockdown and subsequently why the second is required after all the other measures that were taken? Presumably you won't accept that all the other measures were useless either.
You'd better quit buying fuel....and groceries...and clothes...and utilities...and automobiles...and loads of stuff.
How much money do you reckon they'll save by curing the planet of Covid? See if you can guess how many trillions?
Why do you keep asking the same question? Have you forgotten?
Astrazeneca share price down 3.8%
Analysts suspect it may not get US gov approval and the 'at cost' rollout means profits are a long way off.
Mmmm....I can't agree with that.
Last edited:
- Status
Sponsored Links
Similar threads
- Locked
