Good grief Notch.
That's stretching logic and semantics.
That's stretching logic and semantics.
Vaccine booking fiasco
- Thread starter Ihavenojob
- Start date
Sponsored Links
You are getting angry because you are wrong and you've no counter argument.
You have not.
1. There is a risk from some unknown issue with the vaccine.
2. There is a risk of catching Covid if you avoid the vaccine.
3. If all the UK population had taken your "wait and see" approach, we would have seen another Covid wave with full hospitals and more lockdowns.
You have never provided any comparison of 1 and 2 above
Also you have no answer to 3
Until you do, you are a conspiracist acting on emotion not evidence.
It is a real shame for you and your family you are unable emotionally to look at the evidence objectively.
Of course it's a research project...
Why do you think it's being organised and studied by the UK government’s Events Research Programme?
And who said it's covert?
But people need to be better informed before making a decision. You of all people should know that!
So what do you think the risk of contracting Covid is at these events?
1 in 10?
1 in 100?
1 in 1000?
1 in 10000?
Oh that's right, you don't know...
You need to research your lack of understanding of what research means!
I've given my reasons, but you are too thick to take then on board...
You're the one in the wrong if you can't accept people have the right to individual thought...
And by the way, how's your answer to "do tell us, do you believe in forced medication?" coming along?
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 14,267
- Reaction score
- 2,079
- Country
You are a confirmed liar though, why should anyone take any notice?
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 14,267
- Reaction score
- 2,079
- Country
As @Notch7 said,
"Aim of this research programme
The Events Research Programme aims to examine the risk of transmission of Covid-19 from attendance at events and explore ways to enable people to attend a range of events safely.
To achieve this, the programme will explore how a combination of testing and non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs - actions that people can take to mitigate the spread of coronavirus) can inform decisions on safely lifting restrictions at events."
Couldn't give a monkeys...
That's the beauty of individual thought as opposed to being a lemming
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 14,267
- Reaction score
- 2,079
- Country
That's plain to see.
Yeah - from that Guardian article.
No you haven't.
There is a risk of not taking the vaccine
There is a risk from taking the vaccine.
You have yet to provide any evidence of that risk comparison.
In fact you willfully refuse to acknowledge there is a risk from not taking the vaccine.....which undermines your argument on every front
Don't talk utter rubbish, everybody breathing in this country knows that if they increase social contact, they increase risk.
What is your personal risk of catching Covid.
What is your risk of getting ill from Covid?
What is your risk of getting ill from the vaccine?
You must have analysed both of these risks.....otherwise you wouldn't have been able to make an informed choice.
Let's see your evidence
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 14,267
- Reaction score
- 2,079
- Country
wrong
anybody with a brain cell knows that large social events increase covid risk.
What is dishonest about the govt is they already have data from earlier events and have avoided publishing it -Andrew Lloyd Webber has pointed this out, as the data that is available does point out that the risk is low.
Sponsored Links
