Go on then, Mr Katana, explain it.
What exactly is the link between what SG said about the relative upset between what Angela Rayner said about the Tories vs Wayne Couzens crime, and Bodd asking if he was referring to the idea that "all Muslims are terrorists"?
I really look forward to an explanation which makes sense.
Bodd - you wrote it - can you explain how "More are upset Rayner calling Tories scum than this horrific murder by a Police Officer" leads to "Do you mean like all Muslims are terrorists? Is that what your getting at?"?
Bodd - you wrote it - can you explain how "More are upset Rayner calling Tories scum than this horrific murder by a Police Officer" leads to "Do you mean like all Muslims are terrorists? Is that what your getting at?"?
Perhaps you should ask the organ grinder, not the monkey. The monkey seems to be held on a tight leash, in so far as what he is allowed to post.Don’t bother Bodd
He probably 'meant it as a joke'.Don’t bother Bodd
He probably 'meant it as a joke'.
She resigned about two years ago after clearing her name in an investigation. How is her resignation remotely relevant?Parm Sandhu has left the Met ?
.....who's been shamed in the Commons regularly....
...You must have extraordinarily low standards....
Perhaps you should ask the organ grinder, not the monkey. The monkey seems to be held on a tight leash, in so far as what he is allowed to post.
What I've seen so far, is 4 tactics of posters that have said something, that they've been unable to justify:
1, the block, what ever that is, I've yet to ascertain, unless it's the same as 'the ignore'. "I can't justify what I wrote, so I'm ignoring you."
2, CBA, same as number 1 really. But they didn't want to commit themselves to a childish tactic.
3. claiming that the antagonist is really a previously banned person.
4. a few others joining in, perhaps in a kind of tribal way, and accusing the one doing the calling-out, of being argumentative or a trouble-maker.
and now
5. someone else coming along and advising the original person not to bother, who duly obeys.
Are there any frequently employed tactics that I've missed?
He probably 'meant it as a joke'.
She resigned about two years ago after clearing her name in an investigation. How is her resignation remotely relevant?