Just for you Whitespittle...

[WalksWithTurkeys]

But why did the police ignore them and allow them to carry on?
Answer.... Because they were sh*t scared of being labelled racists by pc t*ts like nosebag, as well as being led by people of the same persuasions.

Yup. The authorities even admitted as such.

 

[WalksWithTurkeys]

But why did the police ignore them and allow them to carry on?
Answer.... Because they were sh*t scared of being labelled racists by pc t*ts like nosebag, as well as being led by people of the same persuasions.

Why did the police and everybody else ignore Jimmy Saville, and the Westminster mob, and DJs, and pop stars, and Catholic priests, and boarding school teachers, for decades and allow them to carry on?

Because, ummm, errrr, errrr, errrrr.....

It's cos they're black innit. Simples.

 

[LastMagicBean]

It probably isn't very long ago the poor had NO rights and just had to do what they were told..

Exactly.

He said... "Being wealthy means being better positioned in terms of keeping things like child abuse hushed up".
"The further you go back (in time) the more relevant it becomes."


Surely the further you go back in time, the LESS hushing up was attempted or necessary.

 

[WalksWithTurkeys]

So you are telling me that white people, and brown people, and Moslem people, and Catholic people, and Anglican people, and aetheist people, all got away with it for years, and all were given an easy ride by police and by society at large.

And yet your own prejudices drive you to moan about the brown ones.

People whose convictions are likely to lead to public disquiet or controversy are and have been protected against prosecution much more than the "ordinary guy".
That's always been the case, I don't like it. But I especially don't like the FACT that a particular group of people were brought in to this country from outside, and then offered that same protection above and beyond what you or I would have received, for whatever reasons. And then went on to realise that they were almost untouchable because of who they were and did as they liked. With terrible consequences for some of our society's most vulnerable people.
Should I not moan about that do you think?

As you and I know, it's because some well meaning people see racism everywhere, and rage against the perpetrators. Unfortunately they tend to use the racism tag against anyone who disagree with them politically. It is a potent weapon to silence any kind of dissent. Against uncontrolled immigration? Racist. Unhappy that immigrants get housing? Racist. And so on. I've experienced bullying by left wing extremists. Sadly such types were at the top of the Labour party for years. It's why nutjob terrorist sympathising Imams were allowed to pervert young minds. The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

 

[WalksWithTurkeys]

Being wealthy means being better positioned in terms of keeping things like child abuse hushed up.

It's power, isn't it. Wealth means access to lawyers to slam anyone who has a go. Look at Lord Archer. Guilty as sin, but he destroyed a good man through the courts. An absolute *******. And influence too, of course. It all means that Joe Bloggs can have his or her life destroyed by the powers that be.

 

[EFLImpudence]

Surely the further you go back in time, the LESS hushing up was attempted or necessary.

Well, yes, less active hushing up if you wish to put it like that.

In the past the wealthy were de facto in charge.

Edit - in charge with impunity.

 

[JohnD]

Surely the further you go back in time, the LESS hushing up was attempted or necessary.

What do you mean by that? Prehistoric paedophilia? Or Victorian?

 

[LastMagicBean]

Surely the further you go back in time, the LESS hushing up was attempted or necessary.

Well, yes, less active hushing up if you wish to put it like that.

So, noseall's wrong again then ???

 

[LastMagicBean]

Surely the further you go back in time, the LESS hushing up was attempted or necessary.

What do you mean by that? Prehistoric paedophilia? Or Victorian?

Who knows what he meant by that mystifying statement.??? Do you???

 

[JohnD]

I don't know what Lastmagicbean meant by that mystifying statement.

And you say you don't either?

 

[LastMagicBean]

I don't know what Lastmagicbean meant by that mystifying statement.

And you say you don't either?

Hey, let's not spoil the thread John, just explain what noseall meant then.???

 

[EFLImpudence]

So, noseall's wrong again then ???

I think you are being unkind and pedantic.

Whether the victim is intimidated into keeping quiet from the start or the inquirers are ordered to do nothing, the offence is still 'hushed up'.

Noseall didn't say there was more hushing up in the past; he said in that respect being wealthy was more relevant, presumably, because they were even more untouchable than now.

Therefore correct.

 

[LastMagicBean]

presumably,
Therefore correct.

Marvelous.
So we're all still in the dark then.
So nobody knows what he meant.

 

[JohnD]

Surely the further you go back in time, the LESS hushing up was attempted or necessary.

What do you mean by that? Prehistoric paedophilia? Or Victorian?

Can anybody guess what LMB meant?

 

[Deleted member 63160]

Surely the further you go back in time, the LESS hushing up was attempted or necessary.

What do you mean by that? Prehistoric paedophilia? Or Victorian?

He means the further you go back in time, the less "hushing up" was attempted or necessary. Come on. Speed up.