Why did the police and everybody else ignore Jimmy Saville, and the Westminster mob, and DJs, and pop stars, and Catholic priests, and boarding school teachers, for decades and allow them to carry on?
Because, ummm, errrr, errrr, errrrr.....
Just for you Whitespittle...
- Thread starter noseall
- Start date
Because, ummm, errrr, errrr, errrrr.....
Because they are led by people whose main concern is clinging onto their position, and not upsetting the powers that be by chasing up anything that might prove too controversial for the man in the hot seat. i.e. them.
There are many cases which were being actively investigated and were stopped by intervention from above. Cyril Smith for example.
The establishment always looks to protect the status quo, police chiefs are part of the establishment. And prosecuting famous people, or people in positions of supposed authority upsets the status quo.
As does prosecuting Pakistani gangs who target and exploit young English girls in the country which has taken them and their parents in.
Did you really need all that explaining to you?
So you are telling me that white people, and brown people, and Moslem people, and Catholic people, and Anglican people, and aetheist people, all got away with it for years, and all were given an easy ride by police and by society at large.
And yet your own prejudices drive you to moan about the brown ones.
And yet your own prejudices drive you to moan about the brown ones.
P.C. me? You're avin a larf.
People whose convictions are likely to lead to public disquiet or controversy are and have been protected against prosecution much more than the "ordinary guy".
That's always been the case, I don't like it. But I especially don't like the FACT that a particular group of people were brought in to this country from outside, and then offered that same protection above and beyond what you or I would have received, for whatever reasons. And then went on to realise that they were almost untouchable because of who they were and did as they liked. With terrible consequences for some of our society's most vulnerable people.
Should I not moan about that do you think?
D
Deleted member 63160
This
I believe that this abuse is still rife among the wealthy. I think people like Saville know too much about others who are involved and are essentially given a free pass until they die in return for keeping quiet. I'm thinking when old Harry webb pops his clogs that'll all come out then. Just as with the asian gangs this is a "sickness" that runs right through much of the upper class white male society.
I believe that this abuse is still rife among the wealthy. I think people like Saville know too much about others who are involved and are essentially given a free pass until they die in return for keeping quiet. I'm thinking when old Harry webb pops his clogs that'll all come out then. Just as with the asian gangs this is a "sickness" that runs right through much of the upper class white male society.
Last edited by a moderator:
Only the wealthy?
Surely not.
IMO it is simply a crime that was ignored for centuries because the victims were powerless and could be ignored.
It's not so long ago that if little Samantha told her mum that the priest had put his hand up her skirt, mum would have smacked her round the head for telling wicked lies.
And if an official complaint was made to the Catholic Church, it was their official policy to keep it secret from the police. The child and the family would be browbeaten into keeping quiet, and the pervert would be shipped off to another parish, or even another country, so he could start again with a fresh batch of unsuspecting victims.
Pope Benedict, who has now taken himself off the throne, used to be "the Pope's Enforcer" and was very strict. Perhaps he learned his approach to rules and discipline when he was in the Hitler Youth.
Churches and schools have a lot to apologise for.
D
Deleted member 63160
Did I say "Only" ? No I didn't. Just giving an opinion as to why they get away with it.
Being wealthy means being better positioned in terms of keeping things like child abuse hushed up.
The further you go back (in time) the more relevant it becomes.
The further you go back (in time) the more relevant it becomes.
So, as far as the Catholic Church went, the Police didn't ignore it; they never even knew. Make your mind up.
I am of course making the point that this crime is not confined to any particular religious or ethnic group. It has been endemic among some of the most "respectable" whited sepulchres in our nation for many years.
How do you mean???
Simply because the further you go back in time the fewer rights the poor had.
Also, there was little communication.
It probably isn't very long ago the poor had NO rights and just had to do what they were told..
Also, there was little communication.
It probably isn't very long ago the poor had NO rights and just had to do what they were told..
So paedophilia is a trait of Muslim men. Care to provide proof of that sweeping statement? Many would consider that remark offensive.
