Just for you Whitespittle...

Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
For a minute there I thought, "Ah, at last we're becoming more realistic with our sentences". Then I realised it's 107 years divided between them. I thought for a minute that our sentencing was becoming more like the Yanks do.
 
Jeez. I must really get to the op, because he's starting threads aimed directly at me. Either that, or he's a stalker. Obviously the juvenile names are a vain attempt to boost his non-argument.

When have I, or anyone else on this forum, ever said or hinted that pedos are exclusively Asian?

Just for the benefit of the bozo builder (bringing it down to your level for you), not for the benefit of most on here who have already grasped the real argument -

* The cases I referred to involve hundreds of perpetrators and victims, spanning different cities
* One religious group specialises in this type of wholesale abuse, not Sikhs, Buddhists or Jews
* The biggest and overriding difference is that the case linked by the op was rightly prosecuted and the offenders jailed. However, in the cases I highlighted, all of the authorities tried to sweep a massive pedo ring under the carpet - mainly because they don't want to admit that multiculturalism is a failed project, but also because the religion involved is always a special case.

Yet again, I've had to explain the differences to you nosey. I'm beginning to realise that my initial assessment of you as being as sharp as a marble is totally correct. It's boring to have to explain things over and over to the kid at the back of the class. This is the last time. Please come back with more juvenile names, I can't stop you trying to make up for both the inadequacies in yourself and your arguments - such as they are. Maybe someone else can help you grasp the situation and the differences in the cases.
 
Last edited:
When have I, or anyone else on this forum, ever said or hinted that pedos are exclusively Asian?
You have tried, in the past to insinuate that peaodos operating in large organised gangs was not the 'white' way of hunting children.
 
Last edited:
Jeez. I must really get to the op, because he's starting threads aimed directly at me. Either that, or he's a stalker. Obviously the juvenile names are a vain attempt to boost his non-argument.

When have I, or anyone else on this forum, ever said or hinted that pedos are exclusively Asian?

Just for the benefit of the bozo builder (bringing it down to your level for you), not for the benefit of most on here who have already grasped the real argument -

* The cases I referred to involve hundreds of perpetrators and victims, spanning different cities
* One religious group specialises in this type of wholesale abuse, not Sikhs, Buddhists or Jews
* The biggest and overriding difference is that the case linked by the op was rightly prosecuted and the offenders jailed. However, in the cases I highlighted, all of the authorities tried to sweep a massive pedo ring under the carpet - mainly because they don't want to admit that multiculturalism is a failed project, but also because the religion involved is always a special case.

Yet again, I've had to explain the differences to you nosey. I'm beginning to realise that my initial assessment of you as being as sharp as a marble is totally correct. It's boring to have to explain things over and over to the kid at the back of the class. This is the last time. Please come back with more juvenile names, I can't stop you trying to make up for both the inadequacies in yourself and your arguments - such as they are. Maybe someone else can help you grasp the situation and the differences in the cases.

But here's the problem. Brits of Pakistani origin do include many paedophile gangs, just as Italians in America include many Mafia gangs. But you then go on to imply that it is a characteristic of Muslims, as if most are not appalled. It does seem that part of the problem is that the police allowed the gangs to prosper. If you ignore a crime, it will increase.
 
Jeez. I must really get to the op, because he's starting threads aimed directly at me. Either that, or he's a stalker. Obviously the juvenile names are a vain attempt to boost his non-argument.

When have I, or anyone else on this forum, ever said or hinted that pedos are exclusively Asian?

Just for the benefit of the bozo builder (bringing it down to your level for you), not for the benefit of most on here who have already grasped the real argument -

* The cases I referred to involve hundreds of perpetrators and victims, spanning different cities
* One religious group specialises in this type of wholesale abuse, not Sikhs, Buddhists or Jews
* The biggest and overriding difference is that the case linked by the op was rightly prosecuted and the offenders jailed. However, in the cases I highlighted, all of the authorities tried to sweep a massive pedo ring under the carpet - mainly because they don't want to admit that multiculturalism is a failed project, but also because the religion involved is always a special case.

Yet again, I've had to explain the differences to you nosey. I'm beginning to realise that my initial assessment of you as being as sharp as a marble is totally correct. It's boring to have to explain things over and over to the kid at the back of the class. This is the last time. Please come back with more juvenile names, I can't stop you trying to make up for both the inadequacies in yourself and your arguments - such as they are. Maybe someone else can help you grasp the situation and the differences in the cases.

But here's the problem. Brits of Pakistani origin do include many paedophile gangs, just as Italians in America include many Mafia gangs. But you then go on to imply that it is a characteristic of Muslims, as if most are not appalled. It does seem that part of the problem is that the police allowed the gangs to prosper. If you ignore a crime, it will increase.

No. I didn't imply that being involved in paedophile gangs is a characteristic of muslims. I blatantly stated that wholesale targeting, systematic grooming and sexual abuse of indigenous, caucasian girls by a certain religion seems to be a trait of muslim men. If you care to research this, you will find that this very specific activity is widespread.

As for being appalled, well, I'm sure the 'community' was when it's was caught. But then, even being caught didn't guarantee prosecution - another curious facet of this pattern of offending. But like some terrorist activities that are also quite specific, the appalled ones didn't save any of the victims from their fates. Did they?
 
No. I didn't imply that being involved in paedophile gangs is a characteristic of muslims. I blatantly stated that wholesale targeting, systematic grooming and sexual abuse of indigenous, caucasian girls by a certain religion seems to be a trait of muslim men.
Yes, And you also tried to imply that white paedophiles don't operate in organised gangs. Well they do boyo and I proved you wrong. Again.

I have never denied any of the Muslim child abuse stuff nor have I ever condoned it. All I have done is show that indigenous whites are just as evil and even more so. The original post shows just how much more.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top