Yep. At it's worst we were probably missing 19 out of 20 cases due to lack of any community testing. We're missing less than that now.Because the number of tests is now "way above March" too?
Yep. At it's worst we were probably missing 19 out of 20 cases due to lack of any community testing. We're missing less than that now.Because the number of tests is now "way above March" too?
I'm some cases it is, there's multiple different flu strains and the vaccines typically only cover 3 or 4 each year, typically they are the ones expected to be making a big appearance that winter.that is not true.
you can’t catch it. your’e either born gifted with common sense , or are born stupid.sadly for you.........This is my last post on this thread, in case I get infected by "The Tin Foil Hat" disease.
so pretty pointless really.I'm some cases it is, there's multiple different flu strains and the vaccines typically only cover 3 or 4 each year, typically they are the ones expected to be making a big appearance that winter.
Sometimes when the wrong ones are identified then you get a big outbreak even when people have been vaccinated.
In fact it's pretty much the definition of why you get bad flu seasons, because the vaccines didn't protect against all the major strains that year.
How much could anyone make from 7.5 billion vaccines every year?
You have an amazing ability to get things completely wrong.so pretty pointless really.
said gsk. come off it . cred zero!Glaxo (GSK) reported revenue in 2019 of £541 million on flu vaccines.
Glaxo (GSK) say they do not expect to make a profit out of Pandemic vaccines
https://www.ft.com/content/2e12bcbb-1b9f-4bd6-8ee1-5b0ae3793166
During a call with reporters, Ms Walmsley said that considerations about profits were not guiding GSK, which would only seek returns from the vaccine once the pandemic is decreed over by the World Health Organization. “We are not in the same position as some others. We don’t expect to profit from these vaccine partnerships,” she said. “We want to make sure we’re investing any short-term returns back into long-term pandemic preparedness and donating to the developing world.”
I don't know if Moderna have the same approach.
"The Financial Times reported this week that Moderna is pitching its coronavirus vaccine to potential buyers in a range of about $50 to $60 per dose, higher than prices already disclosed for those being jointly developed by Pfizer and BioNTech, and by AstraZeneca and the University of Oxford."
https://www.ft.com/content/405c0d07-d15a-4f5b-8a77-3c2fbd5d4c1c
in your opinion.You have an amazing ability to get things completely wrong.
Sometimes it's easy to prove how wrong you are. Like when you start going on about vaccines altering your DNA. Other times it would take effort and time to demonstrate how you're wrong.in your opinion.
I'm some cases
when most people get a flu jab they still get flu.
said gsk. come off it . cred zero!

But then again, that is another question...
Which/whose 'evidence' do we believe?
it’s only relevant if you take their figures as gospel , which you obviously do.Any person wishing to look into this (not benny, obviously) might like to read, for example,
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/25/...vaccine-that-protects-against-5-diseases.html
Vast numbers of vaccine doses are made available at negligible cost.
For benny only, please consult page 13 of
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiI9pz_k6DsAhWSoFwKHYMUAHsQFjAAegQIBBAC&url=https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng103/resources/resource-impact-report-pdf-6532121197&usg=AOvVaw0oyHuml03mrm1uBP0CKSrR
and report back the price the NHS pays per flu vaccine dose.