And I answered both. But just in short: no one knows, but probably less able to spread it or not at all.No, just asked if they could spread it.
<snip>
I know I'm being pedantic, but at least I'm not being an arseh0le.
Then why quote me and not just the person asking a question ? Just being a vindictive twunt , weren't you .And I answered both. But just in short: no one knows, but probably less able to spread it or not at all.
I wasn't trying to be an arse about it, but take it as you want.
Because I was following on from your comments.Then why quote me and not just the person asking a question ? Just being a vindictive twunt , weren't you .
Because I was following on from your comments.
Are you having a bad day?
I have been arsey to him in the recent past, so it's not unreasonable. But let's not get this thread locked with pointless bickering for a change.He needs something and someone to hate. Congratulations your the object of his desire for today. His hate will soon pass onto the next DM, Breitbart, FB post. Just stick in there.
Ajohn is talking about someone being vaccinated but still being able to catch and spread the disease. What happens with some Vaccines is that they stop you getting really sick, but you can still get a mild case, but can still pass the disease on to someone who isn't vaccinated and who then gets a severe case.
That's probably not statistically significant sadly. When you get to the fine details like that you need even larger numbers of infections to know for sure.One good thing about the Oxford one is that no one who has had needed to go to hospital. News of course just mentions effectiveness. That makes it truly useful but they have mentioned that they only tested people who were healthy or with underlying but stable conditions.
That's probably not statistically significant sadly
And you are totally stupid...Very...that you have reduced yourself to that level..You used to fancy yourself as a bit of a smart lad..Now you are a vaccine sceptical,UK hating type.
Actually it's likely to give you soreness at the injection site and there's a chance of a slight fever a day or two later.And you are totally stupid...
Unable to analyse the problem and think for yourself!
But hey, I hear the jab will make you 'comfortably numb'
Well you go for it then (whichever one you choose)...Actually it's likely to give you soreness at the injection site and there's a chance of a slight fever a day or two later.
I think you will find that refusing a vaccine is the properly stupid act LAL.Feel free to take your chances with the virus,don’t forget your foil hat to deflect 5G from your numb skull.And you are totally stupid..