Biological experiments

[Dangee]

We’ve seen what a new virus can do to the entire world (apart from China) within just few months.
Are there any restrictions on what countries are allowed to carry out biological experiments, similar to nuclear enrichment or is it a free for all?

 

[Notch7]

novichok seems to be frowned upon

 

[Dangee]

Did you read the post?

 

[EFLImpudence]

We’ve seen what a new virus can do to the entire world (apart from China) within just few months.

Yes, much the same as old viruses.

Using the exaggerated official figures,
1 in 100 (1%) of population have caught it, 1 in 45 (2.2%) of them have died and
1 in 4,600 (0.02%) of population have died.

 

[Dangee]

Anyway, back to the question. Is biological “stuff” globally regulated?
Coz it bloody well should be after this mess.

 

[pete50]

If it isn't they have an inexhausible supply of utter weirdos to experiment on in this forum.

 

[Notch7]

Yes, much the same as old viruses.

Using the exaggerated official figures,
1 in 100 (1%) of population have caught it, 1 in 45 (2.2%) of them have died and
1 in 4,600 (0.02%) of population have died.

I see you still haven't twigged that the death rate hasn't been all that bad BECAUSE of massive global intervention by governments to reduce spread.

I'm surprised you have gone down the conspiracy rabbit hole.

And the official figures haven't been exaggerated you need to go and think about the difficulties of collecting data from causes of death.

Methodology for establishing route cause of death is very difficult.

 

[noseall]

Anyway, back to the question. Is biological “stuff” globally regulated?
Coz it bloody well should be after this mess.

It would have made no difference regards Covid 19.

 

[Notch7]

If it isn't they have an inexhausible supply of utter weirdos to experiment on in this forum.

there seems to be a inexhaustible supply of utter weirdos who bang on about getting freedom back but cant provide one example of how that will affect them.

now thats weird

 

[Dangee]

Why is that Nosey?

 

[motorbiking]

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2002/2677/contents/made

 

[EddieM]

Yes, much the same as old viruses.

Using the exaggerated official figures,
1 in 100 (1%) of population have caught it, 1 in 45 (2.2%) of them have died and
1 in 4,600 (0.02%) of population have died.

1.85 million positive tests, out of a population of ~67 million is 2.76% of the UK population.

of those 1.85 million positives there have been ~64,000 deaths which is 3.45%

64,000 deaths out of a population of 67,000,000 is 0.01% of the population.

 

[EFLImpudence]

I was using the world figures.

 

[EFLImpudence]

I see you still haven't twigged that the death rate hasn't been all that bad BECAUSE of massive global intervention by governments to reduce spread.

That is the debatable part.

I'm surprised you have gone down the conspiracy rabbit hole.

It is the only logical explanation.

And the official figures haven't been exaggerated

Yes, they have -

False positives, with or from covid, neglected other treatments, excess deaths calculated from low average, etc. etc.

you need to go and think about the difficulties of collecting data from causes of death.

Counting forms?

Methodology for establishing route cause of death is very difficult.

Ok - so does that mean you think mistakes have been made?

 

[durhamplumber]

That is the debatable part.


It is the only logical explanation.


Yes, they have -

False positives, with or from covid, neglected other treatments, excess deaths calculated from low average, etc. etc.


Counting forms?


Ok - so does that mean you think mistakes have been made?

Life is one big biological experiment.""Mistakes made""...Hell eye..of course.