Laws of foreign lands

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bodd
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Its all fairly well defined in here:
https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/prostitution-and-exploitation-prostitution

You can advertise for sex.. as long as its not for money and and plenty of prostitute operate legally within a flat or even camper van. Its only an issue when there is more than one working there.

There have been some interesting debates about membership services giving access to 'free' sex. Its a virtual brothel by any other name, but also pretty much what all the less classy dating apps do.

When it comes to immoral earnings, a lot of PIs get a lot of clients by trapping naughty boys on dating sites - everyone take note :D


If a girl advertises the use of a room for rent like an hotel and the punter gets sex as a bonus, would that be paying for sex
 
I'd innovate ...
but seriously, not convinced scrapping income tax will improve things, and the millions of people who live in poverty can't afford to pay more to help fix a broken system
 
I'd innovate ...
but seriously, not convinced scrapping income tax will improve things, and the millions of people who live in poverty can't afford to pay more to help fix a broken system

Would they pay more. They would only pay for what they have. The more money you have the more you will spend. (most of the time)
 
If you're earning plenty and managing to save a little each month, scrapping income tax and putting up tax on goods bought might be good, but how much extra VAT will go on stuff? If it's put on food, my bills will increase by about 100 a month!
 
It is of note that you haven't provided any form of worthwhile response
For example how do the images you have shown of various people relate in any way to full face veils that apply only to women, IE comparable tot he Burka.

As you avoided answering the question about what is your argument, your case, which you claim to have won.
And bragydear has not returned to extricate himself from the nonsense.
I will summarise from your last post that had any form of sensible comment, i.e. the one above.

It would appear that you have no qualms whatsoever about men or women wearing face masks/veils.
Or is it just full face veils that you are concerned with, like the Disney characters, football mascots, motorcyclists, PPE for workers, etc?
Or do you object to any form of partial face veil, like for Brides, surgeons, Japanese, etc?

Or is it just the veils worn by Muslim women that you object to?
 
Clearly I said keep a away from religion or migration.
Clearly you did:
.. can we keep this strickly non immigrant or religious please.
But then someone brought up immigration/religion just a few posts later, (page 5) and the discussion has raged ever since:
So you agree with Boris, we should not introduce a ban on full face veils that Denmark and other European countries have done.
You wait until page 15 until reminding anyone?
 
It would appear that you have no qualms whatsoever about men or women wearing face masks/veils.
Or is it just full face veils that you are concerned with, like the Disney characters, football mascots, motorcyclists, PPE for workers, etc?
Or do you object to any form of partial face veil, like for Brides, surgeons, Japanese, etc?

Or is it just the veils worn by Muslim women that you object to?

Would you like me to explain it to you again?

I am quite happy to do so, since it appears you are struggling to understand the concept.

Would you mind explaining in more detail the part you are finding hard, I can then answer in more specific terms for you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top