If the public see the real cause being addressed, they are more likely to accept the treatment of the symptoms.
An ideal approach to deal with the symptoms is through community action, but that avenue has been defunded.
We brings me back to my Dawn Butler comments. She effectively is a community leader and should have publicised the incident in a far more constructive manner.Then the situation will deteriorate, as more high profile people are stopped and the incident publicised, which will initiate another round of blame and counter-blame. This doesn't really solve the problem of inequality, poverty, discrimination, etc. It serves to reinforce it.
This is getting a bit too much.
Can we have a new rule - stop sharing stupid YT videos made by dickheads for the purpose of supporting the opinion of cockwombles?
There in lies the rub. You're happy to shout from the rafters that there is a problem with institutional racism, but you have no practical answers to how to deal the reality of the day to day crime that the police are having to deal with.
So what are they?And yet, there are practical answers to the reality of institutional racism, and the damage it causes.
Keep your blinkers tightly fastened so you can ignore them.
So what are they. You're happy to criticise and throw in the digs and insults, but can you contribute?
Its not really a conundrum. If community leaders assist by working to improve the relationship between the police and the black community, then that directly addresses one piece of the puzzle.See if you can find the errors I mentioned earlier.
How are you getting on with the conundrum in #172?
Too awkward for you?
Its not really a conundrum. If community leaders assist by working to improve the relationship between the police and the black community, then that directly addresses one piece of the puzzle.
why quote his post and completely ignore the questions in it.But therein lies the problem...
Institutional racism means that by default plod treats black people as suspicious simply because they are in possession of a black skin and they couldn't possibly be able to afford a nice motor 'legitimately'...
There are plenty of crooks in the 'square mile', but you don't see plod targeting those white folks with an offensively expensive suit!
to answer your question is to admit there is a problem as you suggest which also admits their argument has gone out of the window. so they won’t nay can’t answer.So how do you propose to answer my question?
to answer your question is to admit there is a problem
just answer his question , it’s perfectly reasonable.Ah, you're explaining why he can't cope with #172.
This is the same individual who said tha criminals should be jailed the SECOND time they assault a police officer.Cressida Dick
The Gold Commander on the day of the operation, and therefore ultimately in charge, Ms Dick has since been promoted to Deputy Assistant Commissioner, a decision which the De Menezes family described as a "slap in the face" for them
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...es-that-cost-de-menezes-his-life-1064466.html
Nope, we're quite simply back to you trying to avoid the question by focusing on a very small part of the discussion to try and belittle those that have a different viewpoint to yours.Ah, you're explaining why he can't cope with #172.
if they are committing crimes at eight times the rate in those areas then it will be proportionate. If black people are stabbing each other in london then there will not be much point in stop and searching granies in tunbridge wells. The police need to go after who is committing the crime and colour race or religion should never come into it.Is the answer "stop black people at eight times the rate you stop white people?"
Is the answer "handcuff black people but not white people?"
Is the answer "stop cars with black people in because black people look suspicious?"
Is the answer "automatically treat white people with courtesy and respect, and automatically treat black people with contempt and hostility?"
Because those answers don't seem to be working.