Just for you Whitespittle...


“The view of some Islamic preachers towards white women can be appalling. They encourage their followers to believe that these women are habitually promiscuous, decadent, and sleazy — sins which are made all the worse by the fact that they are kaffurs or non-believers.

“Their dress code, from miniskirts to sleeveless tops, is deemed to reflect their impure and immoral outlook.
Wow, how accurate is that. Anyone ever been out in Newcastle on a Saturday night. These guys must have.
 
No sensible argument against that piece, which came straight from the horses mouth then nosebag?
 
No chance of that. Just juvenile insults and continual showcasing of his ignorance. He says that I was wrong about white men and gangs (he actually says 'point out, because he can't say that he proved me wrong). Unless he can show where I said this (he won't/can't), he should consider improving his comprehension skills so that he can understand what others are saying. Little chance of that. Just more lies and insults.

He's now trying to stereotype another part of the population. But when others do that, he's up in arms. Still, I suppose the irony would be wasted on someone like that.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Sooey. It's what I and others on here know and have been trying to explain. But, there are none so blind as those who won't see. And one in particular is just getting sadder and more desperate with each post aimed at me. He knows who he is.
No need to explain. I have never denied the Asian thing nor have I condoned it. The relevance of this post was never about the Asian thing. You and your sidekick Spuey, forever bleating on about it, won't make any difference to the fact that you were wrong, so stop trying to deflect the topic.

All I have done is point out that you were wrong regards white men acting in gangs. Geddit yet? Jeepers, you are s-l-o-w.

I think we have established that they do not deny that many white men, and Christians, and aethists, , are serial abusers, and always have been, and that many of them have escaped justice for years.
 
Thanks Sooey. It's what I and others on here know and have been trying to explain. But, there are none so blind as those who won't see. And one in particular is just getting sadder and more desperate with each post aimed at me. He knows who he is.
No need to explain. I have never denied the Asian thing nor have I condoned it. The relevance of this post was never about the Asian thing. You and your sidekick Spuey, forever bleating on about it, won't make any difference to the fact that you were wrong, so stop trying to deflect the topic.

All I have done is point out that you were wrong regards white men acting in gangs. Geddit yet? Jeepers, you are s-l-o-w.

I think we have established that they do not deny that many white men, and Christians, and aethists, , are serial abusers, and always have been, and that many of them have escaped justice for years.

'Many' is very vague.

When there are also many that seem to be over-represented in a particular offending pattern and the all come from one minority - that's when the alarm bells should start ringing. However, for those riven with pc angst, they will be deaf to the alarm. Even when members of the certain minority are actually sounding the alarm themselves. Can't have better evidence than when it's coming from 'the horse's mouth'.
 
Unless he can show where I said this (he won't/can't), he should consider improving his comprehension skills so that he can understand what others are saying. Little chance of that. .
It's one thing to have our own indigenous pedos, who mainly operate on their own or in small groups as you have given examples.

Quite another to import backwards people whose backgrounds we know nothing about, and then discover that it's in their culture to systematically target white children for sex. This is a dangerous new phenomenon, where whole groups of ROP organise themselves into pedo rings. It's happening all over the country where you find any concentrations of them.

I find it amazing that you rail against pedos, but seem to stand up for cultures where it seems to be almost accepted - until they get caught and the 'community' affects shock. But then, you are full of contradictions.

The white pedos in Bristol seem to work alone as seen in the Gary Glitter conviction, but the ROP always hunt in packs as in this recent Bristol case.



Read more: http://www.diynot.com/diy/threads/child-protection.425957/page-5#ixzz3ljNxMYJR

Your words Mr Spittle. Keep on dithering, its hilarious.
 
When have I, or anyone else on this forum, ever said or hinted that pedos are exclusively Asian?
You have tried, in the past to insinuate that peaodos operating in large organised gangs was not the 'white' way of hunting children.
Unless he can show where I said this (he won't/can't), he should consider improving his comprehension skills so that he can understand what others are saying. Little chance of that. .
It's one thing to have our own indigenous pedos, who mainly operate on their own or in small groups as you have given examples.

Quite another to import backwards people whose backgrounds we know nothing about, and then discover that it's in their culture to systematically target white children for sex. This is a dangerous new phenomenon, where whole groups of ROP organise themselves into pedo rings. It's happening all over the country where you find any concentrations of them.

I find it amazing that you rail against pedos, but seem to stand up for cultures where it seems to be almost accepted - until they get caught and the 'community' affects shock. But then, you are full of contradictions.

The white pedos in Bristol seem to work alone as seen in the Gary Glitter conviction, but the ROP always hunt in packs as in this recent Bristol case.



Read more: http://www.diynot.com/diy/threads/child-protection.425957/page-5#ixzz3ljNxMYJR

Your words Mr Spittle. Keep on dithering, its hilarious.


Dear oh dear. After all your frantic trawling through my old posts, is that the best you can do?

Realising that your grasp of English and comprehension is remedial level - I actually stated 'It's one thing to have our own indigenous pedos, who mainly operate on their own or in small groups.' That's white paedos operating in a small gang, isn't it?

Did you really read 'The white pedos in Bristol seem to work alone' as a definite statement from me that they never, ever work in groups or gangs? Your lack of education is really showing through.


So, you came up with a small gang of white offenders in your op. It has a whole 7 members - making it one of the 'small groups' that I actually said existed. You really don't make this difficult for me.

http://news.sky.com/story/1550832/evil-paedophile-gang-sentenced-to-107-years


For the 'large organised gangs', you need look no further than the usual religion -

http://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/new...ifax-25-men-charged-police-reaction-1-7096362

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...therham-child-sex-abuse-300-new-suspects.html


Back to searching my old posts for you.................
 
I actually stated 'It's one thing to have our own indigenous pedos, who mainly operate on their own or in small groups.' That's white paedos operating in a small gang, isn't it?

Did you really read 'The white pedos in Bristol seem to work alone' as a definite statement from me that they never, ever work in groups or gangs? Your lack of education is really showing through.


So, you came up with a small gang of white offenders in your op. It has a whole 7 members - making it one of the 'small groups' that I actually said existed. You really don't make this difficult for me.

From the article....
Police say an organised criminal network was at the heart of the abuse, where the men from across the country met online, discussed their sexual preferences for very young children and then conspired to carry out the abuse.

Keep dithering boyo.
 
One girl, abused by an organised group/gang of 60. Guess the religion?

QUOTE FROM THE LINK -"The scale of it is, you may agree, horrifying. A estimated that she had sex with about 60 men, almost all Asian."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...-in-Aylesbury-child-sex-ring-court-hears.html

So, back to what I originally said - indigenous paedos - "mainly operate on their own or in small groups" (I've highlighted the important words for the hard of understanding). Wholesale, well organised abuse = ROP. Getting really boring having to keep proving this to some.
 
I actually stated 'It's one thing to have our own indigenous pedos, who mainly operate on their own or in small groups.' That's white paedos operating in a small gang, isn't it?

Did you really read 'The white pedos in Bristol seem to work alone' as a definite statement from me that they never, ever work in groups or gangs? Your lack of education is really showing through.


So, you came up with a small gang of white offenders in your op. It has a whole 7 members - making it one of the 'small groups' that I actually said existed. You really don't make this difficult for me.

From the article....
Police say an organised criminal network was at the heart of the abuse, where the men from across the country met online, discussed their sexual preferences for very young children and then conspired to carry out the abuse.

Keep dithering boyo.

How many actually carried out the abuse, not just talked about it? How many are in this criminal network? How many in the network are white, indigenous? How many are non-white?

You seem to have made another assumption that all in the mysterious 'criminal network' in the article that you quoted ( involving a whole 7 offenders) are all white. Tell me you haven't assumed this, have you nosey?

If you want to stop yourself looking even more stupid than you do, you need hard facts and figures, not vague details.
 
Last edited:
No chance of that. Just juvenile insults and continual showcasing of his ignorance. He says that I was wrong about white men and gangs (he actually says 'point out, because he can't say that he proved me wrong). Unless he can show where I said this (he won't/can't), he should consider improving his comprehension skills so that he can understand what others are saying. Little chance of that. Just more lies and insults.
But that's what Joe does, isn't it?
I'm surprised that people continue to argue the toss when he can't provide any proof of what he says.
 
You still dithering Nosey? :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

So, to summarise: I said - "our own indigenous pedos, who mainly operate on their own or in small groups" and nosey found a small group of convicted indigenous paedos - a whole seven in number. Proving me correct in what originally said.

I have also said that the ROP mainly operate in large, organised groups/gangs, and posted articles of prosecutions of large, organised groups of ROP offenders. Proving me correct again.

So nosey, what the f*** are you droning on about? Boyo.

I'm still waiting.
 
Last edited:
Organised criminal paedophillia is not just the domain of Asian groups. Our own indigenous whites are equally as bad. In fact they are a lot, lot worse.

Can you not see this? The network is huge and a lot more worrying than a bunch of amateur Asian taxi drivers taking advantage of abused runaways.

The white criminal gang targeted newborn children from the outset. They actually groomed the mothers whilst pregnant. The thought process and organisation into their evil depravity was staggering. These boys went global. You gave not got a clue boyo.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top