Just for you Whitespittle...

Now for the last time I KNOW ABOUT THE ASIAN GANG THING SO STOP REPEATING YOURSELF BOYO. OUR WHITE PERVS ARE JUST AS BAD AND JUST AS ORGANISED.
I'm sure that you're right. But are the white pervs as allegedly statistically abundant as those within Asian gangs within the UK?

That's surely the point being asked. As is the question "if not, then why not?"
 
But are the white pervs as allegedly statistically abundant as those within Asian gangs within the UK?

That's surely the point being asked. As is the question "if not, then why not?"
Because our white peados target children that have not yet learned to speak.
 
Don't take my word for it. Even their own imams are saying the same thing.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...mote-grooming-rings-Muslim-leader-claims.html

You need to calm yourself down and not get so easily offended.

Here is what you said:

"I blatantly stated that wholesale targeting, systematic grooming and sexual abuse of indigenous, caucasian girls by a certain religion seems to be a trait of muslim men. If you care to research this, you will find that this very specific activity is widespread."

Firstly the link you give does not support that claim. Secondly the link you give is to an opinion piece by one man. As far as I can see he presents no evidence for his claims, be they true or not. However, even if we for the sake of argument assume that his claims are true, he does not even say what you have said. He has made claims that some Imams (we are not told what percentage, and in which area) are spreading disrespect for women. He does agree that grooming young women, usually white, is a crime among some groups of men of Pakistani heritage, but does not say how many, or how widespread.

The problem is the loose language that you use. It's like saying that whites are prone to getting drunk and fighting outside pubs. Yes, a minority do, most don't. A disrespect for women might be more common among Muslims (but not among those I have known), or it might not be. A minority, presumably very small, of Muslim men form gangs and abuse young white women. Oh, and the link does say that the problem has been created by leftie do-gooders who ignored the issue because they refused to see such issues in ethnic minorities. In many respects the problem is not with Muslims, but with the authorities who failed to act and allowed these crimes to spread. When you do not respond to crime, that crime spreads. (Yes, of course the problem is also with those Muslim men who commit the crimes.)

Incidentally, I had lots of Anglo Gujarati friends when young. I recall that women were expected to stay in the background. But I have seen that in white families too. Sexism is widespread in the UK.
 
Organised criminal paedophillia is not just the domain of Asian groups. Our own indigenous whites are equally as bad. In fact they are a lot, lot worse.

The network is huge and a lot more worrying than a bunch of amateur Asian taxi drivers taking advantage of abused runaways..

But where is this network, except in your imagination? As I asked before, but you haven't answered - How many are in this criminal network? How many in the network are white, indigenous? How many are non-white?

If it's so big, why can you only find a prosecution for a gang of 7 whites? As I said, and the imam said of followers of his own religion, " race and religion were inextricably linked to the recent spate of grooming rings in which Muslim men have targeted under-age white girls"

How is it that I can easily find cases of 25 ROP from a gang being prosecuted; another case of 50 ROP abusing a single girl; 300 new suspects in Rotherham - all within a quick internet search? Where are the big numbers for the large prosecutions of white groups?

Come back with numbers and specifics, not guesswork.

Google and you will find huge numbers of Catholic priests implicated in crimes against children, in North America, Ireland and elsewhere, often in homes for orphans. Ergo a trait of Catholics seems to be that they are paedophiles. (Of course they aren't, but I'm using your logic.) What we have is a small sub-culture allowed to get away with criminality.
 
I wonder how many people reading this think you're the sicko nosey. I certainly do.
Still waiting for your reasons for this statement....?

P.S. pourqoi means why.


This?

I think choice of clothing, choice of venue and the decision to drink as much as possible has a large influence on the sexual behaviour of wor lasses on a neet oot on the Toon.

Dressing as 95% of the girls do on a night out, you're seriously suggesting that most of them end up in alleyways, spreadeagled, at the end of the night?
You're not far off the line "She was asking for it.":eek:
 
Dressing as 95% of the girls do on a night out, you're seriously suggesting that most of them end up in alleyways, spreadeagled, at the end of the night?
You're not far off the line "She was asking for it.":eek:
Of course not no. I was referring to Newcastle on a Sat night. There are certain bars and nightclubs that are nailed on cattle farms that are frequented by rampant stag parties and hen parties with little else in mind other than booze and sex. Many will admit to this also. And I was referring to their behaviour.

Have you ever seen a hen party in full swing?
Have you ever been to Benidorm?
Did you know the Toon was slang for Newcastle?
Have you ever been on a stag doo or a lads away break Brig?
Can you read AJstoneds'mind?
 
Last edited:
Don't take my word for it. Even their own imams are saying the same thing.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...mote-grooming-rings-Muslim-leader-claims.html

You need to calm yourself down and not get so easily offended.

Here is what you said:

"I blatantly stated that wholesale targeting, systematic grooming and sexual abuse of indigenous, caucasian girls by a certain religion seems to be a trait of muslim men. If you care to research this, you will find that this very specific activity is widespread."

Firstly the link you give does not support that claim.


At the risk of repeating myself, these links surely support my claim. (Remember that this is an ethnic minority)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...therham-child-sex-abuse-300-new-suspects.html

http://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/new...ifax-25-men-charged-police-reaction-1-7096362

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...-in-Aylesbury-child-sex-ring-court-hears.html

I would call all of those cases wholesale, systematic and definitely indicating a really consistent pattern. Wouldn't you? (HINT - Remember that this is an ethnic minority)

Nosey has started this whole thread on a couple of false premises. He has seen the admittedly more depraved actions of 7 indigenous offenders, and somehow worked out that because of the more serious nature, my assertions that ROP members operate more in larger, organised networks/groups/gangs and commit greater numbers of crimes considering they are a minority, is wrong. I have demonstrated this with the sheer numbers of offenders in my links. All he can do is keep coming back to 7 convictions in the same case. But it's too late, his ego won't allow his blinkered view to alter.

His second false premise is evident in his opening post. Because I have highlighted serious dangers for society committed disproportionately by his pet religion, he quite bizarrely and childishly labelled me a 'chav luvva'. Presumably this is because he feels that 11 year old girls who were abused by groups of 50 Asians or more are somehow 'chavs' who were asking for it. Maybe this was because by not being covered from head to foot, they put themselves on offer to those of a different and conflicting culture. Maybe this stance is what caused ajstoneservices to call him a sicko. As he apparently persists in saying that white girls are asking to be raped (because that what sex is with a minor) by dozens of Asians - then I have to agree with ajss.
 
Last edited:
Don't take my word for it. Even their own imams are saying the same thing.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...mote-grooming-rings-Muslim-leader-claims.html

You need to calm yourself down and not get so easily offended.

Here is what you said:

"I blatantly stated that wholesale targeting, systematic grooming and sexual abuse of indigenous, caucasian girls by a certain religion seems to be a trait of muslim men. If you care to research this, you will find that this very specific activity is widespread."

Firstly the link you give does not support that claim.


At the risk of repeating myself, these links surely support my claim. (Remember that this is an ethnic minority)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...therham-child-sex-abuse-300-new-suspects.html

http://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/new...ifax-25-men-charged-police-reaction-1-7096362

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...-in-Aylesbury-child-sex-ring-court-hears.html

I would call all of those cases wholesale, systematic and definitely indicating a really consistent pattern. Wouldn't you? (HINT - Remember that this is an ethnic minority)

Nosey has started this whole thread on a couple of false premises. He has seen the admittedly more depraved actions of 7 indigenous offenders, and somehow worked out that because of the more serious nature, my assertions that ROP members operate more in larger, organised networks/groups/gangs and commit greater numbers of crimes considering they are a minority, is wrong. I have demonstrated this with the sheer numbers of offenders in my links. All he can do is keep coming back to 7 convictions in the same case. But it's too late, his ego won't allow his blinkered view to alter.

His second false premise, is evident in his opening post. Because I have highlighted serious dangers for society committed disproportionately by his pet religion, he quite bizarrely and childishly labelled me a 'chav luvva'. Presumably this is because he feels that 11 year old girls who were abused by groups of 50 Asians or more are somehow 'chavs' who were asking for it. Maybe this was because by not being covered from head to foot, they put themselves on offer to those of a different and conflicting culture. Maybe this stance is what caused ajstoneservices to call him a sicko. As he apparently persists in saying that white girls are asking to be raped (because that what sex is with a minor) by dozens of Asians - then I have to agree with ajss.

Without doubt there is a systematic pattern, and a serious problem. But you cannot conclude that to sexually exploit young women it is a trait of Muslim men. Just as you can't say that sexually exploiting orphans is a trait of Catholics. Or getting drunk outside pubs is a trait of white men. By the way some while back the police got hold of a database from a pervert web site, and ended up prosecuting huge numbers of mainly white males for having paedophile images on their computers. I think there were so many that most were ignored, just the worst offenders were dealt with.
 
Don't take my word for it. Even their own imams are saying the same thing.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...mote-grooming-rings-Muslim-leader-claims.html

You need to calm yourself down and not get so easily offended.

Here is what you said:

"I blatantly stated that wholesale targeting, systematic grooming and sexual abuse of indigenous, caucasian girls by a certain religion seems to be a trait of muslim men. If you care to research this, you will find that this very specific activity is widespread."

Firstly the link you give does not support that claim.


At the risk of repeating myself, these links surely support my claim. (Remember that this is an ethnic minority)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...therham-child-sex-abuse-300-new-suspects.html

http://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/new...ifax-25-men-charged-police-reaction-1-7096362

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...-in-Aylesbury-child-sex-ring-court-hears.html

I would call all of those cases wholesale, systematic and definitely indicating a really consistent pattern. Wouldn't you? (HINT - Remember that this is an ethnic minority)

Nosey has started this whole thread on a couple of false premises. He has seen the admittedly more depraved actions of 7 indigenous offenders, and somehow worked out that because of the more serious nature, my assertions that ROP members operate more in larger, organised networks/groups/gangs and commit greater numbers of crimes considering they are a minority, is wrong. I have demonstrated this with the sheer numbers of offenders in my links. All he can do is keep coming back to 7 convictions in the same case. But it's too late, his ego won't allow his blinkered view to alter.

His second false premise, is evident in his opening post. Because I have highlighted serious dangers for society committed disproportionately by his pet religion, he quite bizarrely and childishly labelled me a 'chav luvva'. Presumably this is because he feels that 11 year old girls who were abused by groups of 50 Asians or more are somehow 'chavs' who were asking for it. Maybe this was because by not being covered from head to foot, they put themselves on offer to those of a different and conflicting culture. Maybe this stance is what caused ajstoneservices to call him a sicko. As he apparently persists in saying that white girls are asking to be raped (because that what sex is with a minor) by dozens of Asians - then I have to agree with ajss.

Without doubt there is a systematic pattern, and a serious problem. But you cannot conclude that to sexually exploit young women it is a trait of Muslim men. Just as you can't say that sexually exploiting orphans is a trait of Catholics. Or getting drunk outside pubs is a trait of white men. By the way some while back the police got hold of a database from a pervert web site, and ended up prosecuting huge numbers of mainly white males for having paedophile images on their computers. I think there were so many that most were ignored, just the worst offenders were dealt with.

Yes, perhaps my wording in that one sentence could have been more accurate. I should have said that misogyny is a trait of many muslim men and muslim culture. At best, the rest largely treat them as second class citizens. However, I stand by everything else I have said. Asians are disproportinately involved in the wholesale, organised and systematic group/gang abuse of young Caucasian girls, again remembering that they are a minority. This pattern doesn't seem evident in other minorities in The UK.
 
Last edited:
These men were recently jailed for a Peadophile trafficking ring, Not a Muslim or Asian amongst them.

_82488510_abuse_montage_5.jpg
 
These men were recently jailed for a Peadophile trafficking ring, Not a Muslim or Asian amongst them.
_82488510_abuse_montage_5.jpg
Doesn't count in a racists head. According to Spittle this gang is not big enough. Global does not cut the mustard. Try again. He reckons his Muslim mates trump this tame lot
 
Last edited:
Don't take my word for it. Even their own imams are saying the same thing.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...mote-grooming-rings-Muslim-leader-claims.html

You need to calm yourself down and not get so easily offended.

Here is what you said:

"I blatantly stated that wholesale targeting, systematic grooming and sexual abuse of indigenous, caucasian girls by a certain religion seems to be a trait of muslim men. If you care to research this, you will find that this very specific activity is widespread."

Firstly the link you give does not support that claim.


At the risk of repeating myself, these links surely support my claim. (Remember that this is an ethnic minority)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...therham-child-sex-abuse-300-new-suspects.html

http://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/new...ifax-25-men-charged-police-reaction-1-7096362

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...-in-Aylesbury-child-sex-ring-court-hears.html

I would call all of those cases wholesale, systematic and definitely indicating a really consistent pattern. Wouldn't you? (HINT - Remember that this is an ethnic minority)

Nosey has started this whole thread on a couple of false premises. He has seen the admittedly more depraved actions of 7 indigenous offenders, and somehow worked out that because of the more serious nature, my assertions that ROP members operate more in larger, organised networks/groups/gangs and commit greater numbers of crimes considering they are a minority, is wrong. I have demonstrated this with the sheer numbers of offenders in my links. All he can do is keep coming back to 7 convictions in the same case. But it's too late, his ego won't allow his blinkered view to alter.

His second false premise, is evident in his opening post. Because I have highlighted serious dangers for society committed disproportionately by his pet religion, he quite bizarrely and childishly labelled me a 'chav luvva'. Presumably this is because he feels that 11 year old girls who were abused by groups of 50 Asians or more are somehow 'chavs' who were asking for it. Maybe this was because by not being covered from head to foot, they put themselves on offer to those of a different and conflicting culture. Maybe this stance is what caused ajstoneservices to call him a sicko. As he apparently persists in saying that white girls are asking to be raped (because that what sex is with a minor) by dozens of Asians - then I have to agree with ajss.

Without doubt there is a systematic pattern, and a serious problem. But you cannot conclude that to sexually exploit young women it is a trait of Muslim men. Just as you can't say that sexually exploiting orphans is a trait of Catholics. Or getting drunk outside pubs is a trait of white men. By the way some while back the police got hold of a database from a pervert web site, and ended up prosecuting huge numbers of mainly white males for having paedophile images on their computers. I think there were so many that most were ignored, just the worst offenders were dealt with.

Yes, perhaps my wording in that one sentence could have been more accurate. I should have said that misogyny is a trait of many muslim men and muslim culture. At best, the rest largely treat them as second class citizens. However, I stand by everything else I have said. Asians are disproportinately involved in the wholesale, organised and systematic group/gang abuse of young Caucasian girls, again remembering that they are a minority. This pattern doesn't seem evident in other minorities in The UK.

Okay thanks. I think it is mostly men of Pakistani origin in these gangs, not Chinese or Bangladeshi or Indian. Chinese have the characteristic of doing better in educational terms than the average, but there are some triad gangs in London, only a minority who parasitise off the honest ones.
 
I've just read an interesting article here.
It outlines a lot of the stuff that Whitespittle is frothing at the mouth about as well as a few other interesting details. In particular the fact that whilst grooming gangs are prevalent amongst the Asians (but not exclusively) and that these people target mostly white young vulnerable teens, paedophile rings are exclusively the domain of whites who target the very young and babies.
Google each and see what you get Whitespittle


The report also went on to say that it is likely the Asians targeted the white girls because...... Ceop says: “The comparative levels of freedom that white British children enjoy in comparison to some other ethnicities may make them more vulnerable to exploitation.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top