so you think he means prehistoric times.
so you think he means prehistoric times.
He means the further you go back in time, the less "hushing up" was attempted or necessary. Come on. Speed up.
Going further and further back in time:
1950
1850
1750
1650
55BC
5000BC
Any or all of these?
Define your understanding of the definition of "paedophilia", as a starting point.So paedophilia is a trait of Muslim men. Care to provide proof of that sweeping statement? Many would consider that remark offensive.
so you think he means prehistoric times.
Only the wealthy?I believe that this abuse is still rife among the wealthy.
Surely not.
IMO it is simply a crime that was ignored for centuries because the victims were powerless and could be ignored.
It's not so long ago that if little Samantha told her mum that the priest had put his hand up her skirt, mum would have smacked her round the head for telling wicked lies.
And if an official complaint was made to the Catholic Church, it was their official policy to keep it secret from the police. The child and the family would be browbeaten into keeping quiet, and the pervert would be shipped off to another parish, or even another country, so he could start again with a fresh batch of unsuspecting victims.
Pope Benedict, who has now taken himself off the throne, used to be "the Pope's Enforcer" and was very strict. Perhaps he learned his approach to rules and discipline when he was in the Hitler Youth.
Churches and schools have a lot to apologise for.
WEALTH becomes more relevant! And yes, less hushing up was necessary.He said... "Being wealthy means being better positioned in terms of keeping things like child abuse hushed up".
"The further you go back (in time) the more relevant it becomes."
Surely the further you go back in time, the LESS hushing up was attempted or necessary.
Jeez. I must really get to the op, because he's starting threads aimed directly at me. Either that, or he's a stalker. Obviously the juvenile names are a vain attempt to boost his non-argument.
When have I, or anyone else on this forum, ever said or hinted that pedos are exclusively Asian?
Just for the benefit of the bozo builder (bringing it down to your level for you), not for the benefit of most on here who have already grasped the real argument -
* The cases I referred to involve hundreds of perpetrators and victims, spanning different cities
* One religious group specialises in this type of wholesale abuse, not Sikhs, Buddhists or Jews
* The biggest and overriding difference is that the case linked by the op was rightly prosecuted and the offenders jailed. However, in the cases I highlighted, all of the authorities tried to sweep a massive pedo ring under the carpet - mainly because they don't want to admit that multiculturalism is a failed project, but also because the religion involved is always a special case.
Yet again, I've had to explain the differences to you nosey. I'm beginning to realise that my initial assessment of you as being as sharp as a marble is totally correct. It's boring to have to explain things over and over to the kid at the back of the class. This is the last time. Please come back with more juvenile names, I can't stop you trying to make up for both the inadequacies in yourself and your arguments - such as they are. Maybe someone else can help you grasp the situation and the differences in the cases.
But here's the problem. Brits of Pakistani origin do include many paedophile gangs, just as Italians in America include many Mafia gangs. But you then go on to imply that it is a characteristic of Muslims, as if most are not appalled. It does seem that part of the problem is that the police allowed the gangs to prosper. If you ignore a crime, it will increase.
No. I didn't imply that being involved in paedophile gangs is a characteristic of muslims. I blatantly stated that wholesale targeting, systematic grooming and sexual abuse of indigenous, caucasian girls by a certain religion seems to be a trait of muslim men. If you care to research this, you will find that this very specific activity is widespread.
As for being appalled, well, I'm sure the 'community' was when it's was caught. But then, even being caught didn't guarantee prosecution - another curious facet of this pattern of offending. But like some terrorist activities that are also quite specific, the appalled ones didn't save any of the victims from their fates. Did they?
So paedophilia is a trait of Muslim men. Care to provide proof of that sweeping statement? Many would consider that remark offensive.
No need to explain. I have never denied the Asian thing nor have I condoned it. The relevance of this post was never about the Asian thing. You and your sidekick Spuey, forever bleating on about it, won't make any difference to the fact that you were wrong, so stop trying to deflect the topic.Thanks Sooey. It's what I and others on here know and have been trying to explain. But, there are none so blind as those who won't see. And one in particular is just getting sadder and more desperate with each post aimed at me. He knows who he is.