Should we take more Syrian's?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Non-English speaking uneducated peasants are of no use to anyone. They'll be welfare dependent forever.
 
Sponsored Links
most off "these people" have risked death or extreme danger abject poverty spending there life savings
most will work far harder than the local population for lower conditions often in over crowded accommodation to better them selves
they are often very educated
and its simply a myth that they want to scrounge they want to work hard and pay there way they simply want a chance to a normal uncomplicated safe life
most want a stable country where they can sleep without the fear off death at any time
as a humane country we need to be more caring there plights are a thousand times worse than our situation on its worst day :(
Well lets hope for Germany's sake that is correct and that in a few years time they will not be making demands for more mosques, sharia law, halal practices, death for gays etc etc.
Are the one's shown using their Iphones getting the service for free?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Big-all's keyboard :D

keyboard_black[1].png
 
Sponsored Links
Non-English speaking uneducated peasants are of no use to anyone. They'll be welfare dependent forever.
Like a fair chunk of our existing illiterate WASP population, who are British born and bred?

UK nationals are around two-and-a-half times more likely to be claiming working age benefits than non-UK nationals when looked at as a proportion of the population.
 
Non-English speaking uneducated peasants are of no use to anyone. They'll be welfare dependent forever.
Like a fair chunk of our existing illiterate WASP population, who are British born and bred?

UK nationals are around two-and-a-half times more likely to be claiming working age benefits than non-UK nationals when looked at as a proportion of the population.
Yes, you've hit the nail on the head.
We should send all of our benefits claimants who are capable of working to go to Syria to fight ISIS.

Oh, all right. I do have a heart.

Give them rifles, then.
 
Non-English speaking uneducated peasants are of no use to anyone. They'll be welfare dependent forever.
Like a fair chunk of our existing illiterate WASP population, who are British born and bred?

UK nationals are around two-and-a-half times more likely to be claiming working age benefits than non-UK nationals when looked at as a proportion of the population.
Yes, you've hit the nail on the head.
We should send all of our benefits claimants who are capable of working to go to Syria to fight ISIS.

Oh, all right. I do have a heart.

Give them rifles, then.
You won't find me arguing with that view point!
 

to be honest chaps if it doesn't spoil what i am trying to say then i dont actually care
i do spend quite a lot off time trying to spell correctly but punctuation grammar context and all the other things that come easy to some but not me if i correct all the unimportant bits i would have half the amount off time to be helpful
so guess what i appologize iff it upsets or offends any one but to be honest its not my problem :D:rolleyes:
and yes i realise its all been done in the best possible friendly way but as i say life is to short :rolleyes:
 
That maybe so, but with 20,000,000 people on the move, you let us know where they will all go.

How many new mosques will we need to build?

So we can't take all. So we should take none?

We've already grown our population by 4 million in the last few years. Projected to reach 70 million by 2027 - even before the current swarms. When will you admit that enough is enough? When our services completely break down?

Whilst your sentiments may be admirable, as usual, those who gush about saving the poor, suffering coffee-coloured ones aren't hard-wired to reality. Anyway, I'm not sure that our hard pressed security services could cope with a surge in the ROP population.

I saw Vette Cooper and Sturgeon interviewed on Sky news int. this morning. Both were asked point blank if they would take immigrants into one of their homes. Cooper said "yes if it becomes really necessary". I thought it was already?? Sturgeon changed the subject angle. Both referred to local authorities taking the lead. Strange that.

Because they're all hypocrites who will do it to us, but won't suffer one bit from ever increasing immigration. They're just about to elect another hypocrite in Corbyn. Brought up in a manor house, private school, champagne-socialist parents, son at a good grammar school and a bother called Piers. Hmm. That's about right for a socialist. One thing for the plebs, but only the best for them and theirs. And the bleeding hearts fall for all of the lefty propaganda issued by these people. The lefty politicians say let them all in, but they won't be rubbing shoulders with the unwashed masses whom they won't even be able to see from their ivory towers.
 

to be honest chaps if it doesn't spoil what i am trying to say then i dont actually care
i do spend quite a lot off time trying to spell correctly but punctuation grammar context and all the other things that come easy to some but not me if i correct all the unimportant bits i would have half the amount off time to be helpful
so guess what i appologize iff it upsets or offends any one but to be honest its not my problem :D:rolleyes:
and yes i realise its all been done in the best possible friendly way but as i say life is to short :rolleyes:
Just a bit of fun big-all. I wasn't really having a go. What is strange though is that there is nothing wrong with you spelling apart from that word. I honestly thought that after it had been mentioned a few times that you were keeping it up on purpose.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top